Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Lingualized Occlusion¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A Study on the lingualized Occlusion

±¸°­»ý¹°Çבּ¸ 1988³â 12±Ç 1È£ p.181 ~ 190
Á¤ÀçÇå, ±èÁ¤Èñ, ÃÖ¸í½Ä,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¤ÀçÇå ( Chung Chae-Heon ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±èÁ¤Èñ ( Kim Jeong-Hee ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÃÖ¸í½Ä ( Choi Myung-Sik ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


It is impossible to create a purely static and stable artificial occlusion, because the supporting structures are constantly changing. Artificial occlusion must make accommodation for this.
There are numerous concepts, techniques, and philosophies concerning complete denture occlusion. Some dentists believe there should be cusps on the teeth and that they must be in complete harmony with the dynamics of mandibular function. Other dentists think that the teeth should not have cusps because they create forces that are difficult to control.
Lingualized occlusion is an attempt to maintain the esthetic and food-penetr4tioil advantages of the anatomic form while maintaining the mechanical freedom of the nonanatomic form. The most important of this occlusion is their ability to better adapt to different occlusal relationships that result from the gradual, but inevitable, reduction in the height of the supporting ridge. The lingualized concept utilizes anatomic teeth for the maxillary denture and modified nonanatomic or semianatomic teeth for the mandibular denture.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI